Hourly Medical Billing Employees Are Not Your Best Option

Posted on December 31, 2008 @ 1:45 pm
by Carl Mays II

One of the key advantages of billing outsourcing, when it is done correctly, is the clear alignment of incentives between the practice and the billing company.

Almost all medical billing companies are paid a percentage of what they collect. This means they are only paid when you are paid. It also means the more they collect for your practice, the more they are paid. Internal medical billers, on the other hand, are almost always hourly employees. They are paid based on showing up in your office, not based upon how well they perform your medical billing or how much money they collect for your practice. This is not an alignment of incentives.

This is a critical distinction that is easily missed because of the misplaced belief that if the billers work for the practice then they care more about its collections. I am not saying they do not care, but I am saying that when your biller has their economic incentives completely aligned with yours (as with a medical billing service) it makes a big difference in how they think about your medical billing and how well they perform their job.

In a recent meeting with a multi-physician provider practice I was told a tale that I have heard many times before. One of the offices multiple medical billers was out for a few days. While she was out her supervisor was looking through the billers desk for some information that was needed. What she found was over $40,000 worth of old claims that the biller had stuck in her bottom drawer and never billed. As if this was not bad enough, almost all of the claims were beyond the timely filing deadlines and the money was lost forever. When the medical biller was back in the office she was reprimanded for this horrendous error. She was not terminated - she kept her job despite the fact the office lost thousands of dollars because of this horrific medical billing performance.

When I asked the doctor why a more severe action was not taken, he explained to me that “we already have staffing problems and did not want to alienate the billing staff any further.” The guilty biller was apparently moved to the front-desk role and is now responsible for gathering demographic information and money.

There should be safety nets in place to catch $40,000 in missing claims. So how could this have gone unnoticed until a desk excavation? The office did not track and reconcile charges, payments or write-offs. The doctors had been told that the practice’s system could not report at this level. The system, however, indeed had the capability to do this, but the billing staff did not know how to properly use it. Without the the fully aligned incentives of a medical billing company, the investment is often not made to full utilize the capabilities of a practice’s medical billing system. $40,000 in missing charges is likely only the tip of the ice berg for this medical practice.

Utilizing a medical billing company is not a panacea for such situations, but if you insure the following actions are built into your agreement with the billing service, you should be in good shape:

- A fully integrated tracking system (charges by locations/provider and payments by source - lock box, office, PO Box) should be in place and you should have full visibility into the system at all times.

- The medical billing service should assume full responsibility for timely filing issues and pay the practice the allowed amount for any claims they fail to submit prior to the timely filing deadline. This eliminates the risk a practice has when the billing is done by in-house billers who will never provide such a guarantee.

- 24/7 access to the medical billing system so that full transparency exists between the practice and the medical billing company.

Physicians are working harder for less as costs rise and reimbursements fall. This is exacerbated by selecting a medical billing approach that does not have the proper alignment of incentives to prevent disasters (such as $40,000 in unbilled charges) from occurring.

It has been said that the definition of insanity is doing things the same way and expecting different results. This certainly applies in the story outlined above. The biller that left $40,000 in charges unbilled will likely continue to cost the practice money. Just because she works for the practice does not mean she represents their best medical billing solution.

A judicious selection of a medical billing company that meets the criteria outlined above is your most direct and reliable method for avoiding your own medical billing horror stories.

Copyright 2008 by Carl Mays II

About the Author:






Leave a Reply